Use of naloxone by law enforcement
I am pretty new to knowledge about the opioid epidemic. It is crazy to think some police don't want to carry naloxone, though we carry other things like activated charcoal for misuse of intended and unintended poisonings.
But I do want to learn more about police attitudes and what is behind those that don't want to carry it, and how syndromic surveillance data has helped change these attitudes.
I also acknowledge that police may be responding to opioid activity multiple times a day and that many can turn violent. I used to work in HIV, and this kind of black humor is somewhat prevalent. We have to acknowledge those who feel a lack of progress in things can turn pessimistic.
But I do want to learn more about police attitudes and what is behind those that don't want to carry it, and how syndromic surveillance data has helped change these attitudes.
I also acknowledge that police may be responding to opioid activity multiple times a day and that many can turn violent. I used to work in HIV, and this kind of black humor is somewhat prevalent. We have to acknowledge those who feel a lack of progress in things can turn pessimistic.
a) Not every department cares about population health, or equity, the way they should (this is usually dependent on departmental culture as it is passed down the ranks from the chief…)
b) For those that do, it still takes a lot of training for officers to develop the proper skills they need;
and c) Even with the best of intentions, both police-community mistrust and poor state and local policy choices can really confound our efforts.
This makes working with police really difficult and sometimes impossible!
All the best,
Daniel