CSTE National ELR Workgroup

Welcome to the CSTE National ELR Workgroup Basecamp! We hope you will utilize the space to share resources with colleagues, start discussion threads, and identify topics for the workgroup to tackle on future calls. All workgroup members will have the opportunity to join. Please note that you may edit your notification preferences to suit your needs (and your email inbox). If you are not already on the ELR distribution list and would like to receive call communications, please enroll using this subscription form (copy and paste in browser): https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/5a91a4579952496682084796b82112e6

HHS Diagnostic Antigen Testing Machine Delivery to LTCF - ELR reporting?

Hi, 
As long term care facilities receive the antigen testing machines, how are states handling electronic lab reporting? I imagine many facilities don't have the IT capacity to even get these connected to their health record systems? Let alone, ELR onboarding? 
Any tips would be great!
Thanks - Veronica

Comments & Events

Mark Dittman
They’ve lit the house on fire by distributing these devices with little to no useful output of data. We are having a major issue in PA right now with this. I am told many facilities can’t even operate the devices and are unable to get proper training. Our only option is to distribute our CSV template and I have suggested that we look into leveraging our help desk staff to consider some online training sessions to learn how to manually populate our CSV template. I am afraid that the national template will now be too complex for these facilities. Our other complicating factor is that any facility intending to use these machines must be licensed by our state bureau of labs. It is a colossal you know what, thank you HHS/CMS.
John Satre, Informatician at Iowa Department of Public Health
Agreed.  Iowa is distributing 1 CSV template to everyone (not the national version) that we had to distribute much earlier than when the national one became available.  

Some of our partners (very few) are able to perfectly meet that specification, so after a quick 1-2 minute visual review, we drop those into a folder and Rhapsody picks it up for automatic processing.

For those that cannot meet our specification perfectly, we've set up a customized 2-sheet transformation in Excel: 1 sheet is where we drop the in-bound data exactly as it comes in; the other sheet transfers data using formulas and vlookup from the first sheet to meet our specification perfectly. We may need to add CLIA#s, translate values like race, ethnicity, test & result values into coded values, data formatting, etc. So this is customized based on sender - easier to do this than create so many Rhapsody mappers.... and we can recruit additional staff familiar with Excel if/when it's necessary.

This has been manageable so far, but not sure if this approach will work if we get flooded with a large number of LTC facilites, which may be pretty low-tech & low-tech savvy (very little experience with spreadsheets) reporters.
Corinne Davis, ELR Specialist at TN
In TN, we set up a POC reporting registration portal in REDCap to get an idea of how many people would register. The registration has been open for 3 weeks and 232 different reporters have registered for POC reporting. We attempt to get as many as we can to submit using Excel, but many need to report manually because of a lack of technical resources and personnel.

From that registration survey, we are able to pre-populate another REDCap project with the reporter/facility/provider information for results reporting. Since early August, we have received nearly 4000 POC results. It is taking about 1-2 minutes to manually enter a result. The reporters only need to complete the patient demographics and result everything else is pre-populated for them.

The results are pulled automatically from REDCap using R hourly and translated into a format Rhapsody can consume. Then imported into NBS.
John Satre, Informatician at Iowa Department of Public Health 💥
Brooke Beaulieu, Surveillance/Informatics Program Analyst at CSTE
Hi folks, posting on behalf of Dan Pollock is who having some troubles replying to the discussion thread:

Hello Everyone:

FYI, CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) is moving forward with plans to enable nursing homes to report point-of-care COVID-19 test data to NHSN.  Over 15,000 nursing homes nationwide are now enrolled in NHSN as a result of a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) COVID-19 reporting requirement introduced in May 2020.  This comprehensive participation of nursing homes in NHSN provides an opportunity to extend surveillance coverage to POC test data in a timely way.  Our plans are to (1) provide a means for nursing homes to report POC test data to NHSN, (2) enable state and local health departments to gain access to those data in the NHSN application (using the NHSN Group Function), and (3) to introduce a data export feature that will enable use of HL7 ELR messages to convey the POC data from NHSN via the AIMS Platform to state and local health departments.   NHSN’s nursing home POC test data surveillance is at an early stage of planning and development.  We will be glad to discuss our plans with you on a call, and we will gladly include everyone’s input to the fullest extent.            

Thanks,
Dan
John Satre, Informatician at Iowa Department of Public Health 👍
Nancy Barrett, Epi 4/PH Informatics Specialist
Hi Brooke et al,
Looks like we have some topics for next week.

1. Agree as always with Mark and John that we also distribute the 'local' template we have. I have not made the push to update with variables from the universal, but going out soon. May not be able to get much but if we can at least get some consistency for what we really need that will be something. Licensing is the same for CT as in PA. And LTCF are not the only POC locations getting antigen testing set up (testing that as of now means that negatives should be confirmed with another test which will not happen). These urgent care/doc in the box centers have never been good reporters, and generate a file -- hahaha! And now private schools others are setting up testing as well. The Coast Guard Academy has no computer system, so they cannot even generate a file for us. So we still need to deal with paper reports.

2. Would be interested in seeing TN's approach and who/how they identified POC to contact for that. While not all of us have RedCap in use, the ideas would be useful.

3. Per NHSN -- I am only interested if the LTCF messages get pushed to AIMS and then to us. I am not going to add another layer of data chasing, nor do I need our HAI programs - who helped nursing homes get set up with NHSN reporting (didn't HHS just change that to TeleHealth?)  - to be an internal source of data unless it is in a usable format.

There must be a better way. OR we need to stop worrying about data from LTCF going into our surveillance systems, and also have POC at least report positives to LHDs who have access to our contact tracing system and get updates back from that system. Something has got to give.
John Satre, Informatician at Iowa Department of Public Health
Is anyone on this message thread that might be able to reach out to CMS and get two columns added to the Point_Of_Care_Device_Allocation Excel spreadsheet?
  1.  the CLIA# for each LTC facility
  2.  the phone number for each LTC facility
The file can be downloaded from this site and sorted by state: