EH Position Statements - CO Poisoning

Document Michigan 2014 CO Surveillance report (publ 2016).pdf (1.03 MB)

Download ↓

   This review that Martha Stanbury co-authored found 50% of non-smokers and 51% of smokers who were confirmed as non-occupational cases of CO poisoning by investigation had COHb% below 5% or 10%, respectively (Table 8).  
    The prevalence of low COHb levels among confirmed occupational cases was even higher, with 64% of non-smokers under 5% and 59% of smokers under 10%.   
     These results cast doubt on the appropriateness of using COHb thresholds to confirm cases, unless also specifying that lower COHb levels are not grounds for excluding cases who may meet alternative criteria (such as 1 or more CO symptoms and a recent CO exposure confirmed by some alarm or inspection).   
     -- Albert Donnay

Comments & Events

Albert D. posted this on · Download ↓
Yang Liu
Hey I think you got the wrong Yang Liu for this email chain.
Albert Donnay
Sorry about that. Did you not sign up via cste to be on workgroup for EH18-01 App 6 about CO surveillance?

Albert
Yang Liu
No not at all
Hayleigh McCall, Program Analyst III, Syndromic Surveillance at CSTE
Hi Yang,

I will remove you from this Basecamp - sorry for any inconvenience!

Thanks,
Hayleigh
Vjollca Berisha
Please do not remove me. I am interested in reading documents unless there is a reason to remove me. Thanks, Vjollca
Hayleigh McCall, Program Analyst III, Syndromic Surveillance at CSTE
Hi Vjollca,

I didn't remove you! Only Yang was removed.

For others, feel free to let me know if you would like to be removed from this Basecamp by emailing me at hmccall@cste.org (to avoid filling up people's inboxes).

Thanks!
Hayleigh McCall at CSTE
Vjollca Berisha
I am sorry for misunderstanding! Thanks, Vjollca