Policy Brief on Public Health Entomologists Core Group

Document PH Ent Policy Brief clean draft 1 21 20_1400hrsCST (RRD comments).docx (225 KB)

Download ↓

Just made some comments and minor edits for consideration.  Sorry that I have to teach today during the identified time slot.

Rhoel

Comments & Events

Rhoel D. posted this on · Download ↓
Rhoel Dinglasan
Abelardo, not sure if you saw this upload...
Abelardo Moncayo
Hi everyone,

Thanks to those who were able to be on the call today.  Rhoel, thanks for your comments - very helpful.  Attached here is the updated version circulation.  The plan is for Ben and Sue to run this version by policy folks at CDC to make sure it causes no headaches and that we have their support.  Once we get the green light from CDC policy experts, we will send it to NAVCO and other colleagues (Laura had identified many) to get their feedback.  At that point please send it to whomever you think should take a look. 

How does this schedule sound:
1. By January 31, Ben and Sue inform us about any concerns from a policy perspective at CDC.
2. We send the brief to NAVCO and other colleagues for review and request they provide feedback by February 7.
3. We consider their comments and finalize the brief by February 14.
4. Ashley emails the brief to CSTE VBD Subcommittee members and request comments by February 21.
5. During Vector Week we deliberate (if needed), present the brief at Tuesday morning session that Ben mentioned, and send the final policy brief to breifs@cste.org.

Let me know if this sounds OK.

Thanks,
Abelardo
Abelardo Moncayo
Meant to delete the word "circulation" in the 3rd sentence in my message above.
Abelardo Moncayo
Also, the Vector Week session is on Wednesday morning.  Sorry, multitasking at home :(
Carl Williams
Abelardo, that power point presentation looks really good! Thanks for doing that. It is very clear and concise. 

Carl
Ben Beard
Thanks. We should be able to do some form of this…maybe not all of the slides, however. Is it possible maybe to squeeze it down to 2 slides?
Ben Beard
That will work. I’ll probably present it as a part of the introductory comments I make on Tuesday morning.
Abelardo Moncayo
Excellent - thanks for doing that!
Abelardo Moncayo
Happy Valentine's Day everyone, 

Below is the result of the review from CDC on the policy brief.  I attempted to revise the brief (attached) based on these comments.  Let me know what you think.  If we can all agree, we can send these out to colleagues for comments including NAVCO and the CSTE VBD Subcommittee.  Thanks, Abelardo

"First, thank you for providing this opportunity for CDC to provide a technical review of your draft CSTE Policy Brief. We really appreciate your thought and consideration, as well as your commitment to the prevention and control of vector-borne diseases. 
 
There is broad support within the Division for having an entomologist in every state, which would support better state and local preparedness and response capacity for vector-borne disease prevention and control. However, it is important to realize that CDC does not currently have the resources to support additional positions, through ELC. CDC supported 21 entomological positions through the FY2019 ELC award process. These entomologists were diverse in their educational backgrounds as well as their appointments (e.g., full-time, part-time, contract, or FTE). CDC could not implement the proposed recommendation for an entomologist in every state unless additional funds were made identified.
 
We have one comment on the figure that reflects CDC’s role. As currently configured, the state entomologist interacts with a variety of stakeholders, who in turn interact with CDC on “informing best practices for vector control practices”.  At present, states with entomologists already engage directly with CDC to facilitate generation of local best practices for vector control.  It is also important to note that there is no one size-fits-all model for interaction between state entomologists and CDC, due to the vast range in vector-borne disease epidemiology, ecology, local regulatory, and legal environment and available resources.
 
Finally, we have one editorial edit on page 1: be “Ehrlichia muris eauclairensis”."
Rhoel Dinglasan
?See attached for minor edits.


Rhoel R. Dinglasan, PhD, MPH
Associate Professor of Infectious Diseases
UF Eminent Scholar
DIRECTOR, CDC Southeastern Regional
Center of Excellence for Vector Borne Diseases:
The Gateway Program
EMERGING PATHOGENS INSTITUTE
University of Florida
Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology
College of Veterinary Medicine
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology
College of Medicine
2055 Mowry Road, Rm 375
Gainesville, FL 32611
Tel. 352 294 8448
Ben Beard
Hi Abelardo,
This looks fine to me. Thanks and see you in a couple of weeks!

Ben
Abelardo Moncayo
Here is the final draft.

Ashley, can you share this today with VBD CSTE Subcommittee members and request their comments by next Friday, February 21? 

Courtney, could you share this with the NAVCO members and also ask them for feedback by next Friday?

All, please share with anyone else you think would be appropriate.  

Thanks!
Abelardo

Rhoel Dinglasan
?Thanks, Abelardo.


Rhoel R. Dinglasan, PhD, MPH
Associate Professor of Infectious Diseases
UF Eminent Scholar
DIRECTOR, CDC Southeastern Regional
Center of Excellence for Vector Borne Diseases:
The Gateway Program
EMERGING PATHOGENS INSTITUTE
University of Florida
Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology
College of Veterinary Medicine
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology
College of Medicine
2055 Mowry Road, Rm 375
Gainesville, FL 32611
Tel. 352 294 8448
Abelardo Moncayo
Ben,

Here is an updated ppt for your presentation to reflect some minor changes based on the CDC review.

Thanks,
Abelardo
Ben Beard
Got it. Thanks.
Abelardo Moncayo
Ben,

I took out the Tennessee logo on the last slide and replaced it with the CSTE logo to better represent all the states.  Please use this version instead.

Thanks!
Abelardo
Ben Beard
Sounds good. Thanks Abelardo.

-b
Abelardo Moncayo
Hi all - looks like most of the comments are in and not much to revise.  David Neitzel commented that resources for PHEs would be important.  I changed the sentence about state funding slightly to cover that (change highlighted):  "States should establish state funding for these positions as well as for vector-borne disease resources that are tailored to the needs of the jurisdiction."  I added similar wording in the CDC funding sentence (change highlighted): "The CDC, through the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity cooperative agreement, should continue to provide funding for Public Health Entomologist positions and resources as funding permits.  This will demonstrate a concerted, cooperative, approach to addressing vector-borne disease issues utilizing state and federal resources." 

All other comments were largely cosmetic.  Here is the final version.  I suggest we wait to submit to CSTE during or after Vector Week in case anyone else has any comments during the week.  I think we are in good shape. 

See you next week!
Abelardo
Abelardo Moncayo
Hi team,

It was great seeing all of you at Vector Week last week!  I think we are ready to submit this document to CSTE.  Question:  under technical advisors, any objections to adding NAVCO since many of their members provided input?  Any other last thoughts before we submit?

Thanks,
Abelardo

Rhoel Dinglasan
?Hi Abelardo, I do not have any issues with this.


Rhoel R. Dinglasan, PhD, MPH
Associate Professor of Infectious Diseases
UF Eminent Scholar
DIRECTOR, CDC Southeastern Regional
Center of Excellence for Vector Borne Diseases:
The Gateway Program
EMERGING PATHOGENS INSTITUTE
University of Florida
Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology
College of Veterinary Medicine
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology
College of Medicine
2055 Mowry Road, Rm 375
Gainesville, FL 32611
Tel. 352 294 8448
Carl Williams
I am fine with adding NAVCO. Thanks for all the work on this Abelardo.

Carl
Courtney Youngbar
Thanks, Abelardo!