Question for the partners
Hi, everyone.
AIM, seeing the the 1600 partner synchronization call on the schedule of events, requested call information so that they can participate. SCTF welcomed AIM to join the call.
Assuming the partner synchronization call was originally intended for APHL, ASTHO, CSTE, and NACCHO, AIM's request raises a matter our four orgs have previously discussed before with DSLR regarding when partner coordination calls should just be among our four orgs and when it should include other critical partners (e.g., AIM). Gerritt and I were discussing this and wanted to get your thoughts on it. Given the number of vaccination decisions and issues undergoing deliberation in the current pandemic scenario, we agreed that it made sense for AIM to be a part of the 1600 partner synchronization call. What do you all think?
AIM, seeing the the 1600 partner synchronization call on the schedule of events, requested call information so that they can participate. SCTF welcomed AIM to join the call.
Assuming the partner synchronization call was originally intended for APHL, ASTHO, CSTE, and NACCHO, AIM's request raises a matter our four orgs have previously discussed before with DSLR regarding when partner coordination calls should just be among our four orgs and when it should include other critical partners (e.g., AIM). Gerritt and I were discussing this and wanted to get your thoughts on it. Given the number of vaccination decisions and issues undergoing deliberation in the current pandemic scenario, we agreed that it made sense for AIM to be a part of the 1600 partner synchronization call. What do you all think?
Comments & Events
Ericka McGowan
I concur.
Jordan Peart
I agree.
Stephanie Chester
I agree as well. I think it should depend on the topics at hand and concur in this situation.