Special Emphasis Reports- CSTE Injury WG

MVT SER Brainstorming

Hi All,

Thank you for joining the MVT SER call on Friday! Please comment on this post with your ideas and suggestions for concepts/topics (headers in the report) and data points (graphs and text in the report) for the MVT SER. Our next meeting is Friday, April 17 at 1pm ET. Please post your ideas/suggestions by Wednesday, April 15 so that we are ready to discuss during the call.

Thank you all for your work on this SER!

Best,
Kristen & Kristina

Comments & Events

Beth Hume
Hi everyone,
I am posting counts/rates for MVT from WISQARS and NEISS by agegroups. We discussed that age groups may need to vary depending on which person is injured (MVT-occupant, pedestrian, etc.). For the MVT occupant and totals it may be useful to have these agegroups (0-14, 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-69, 70+). These aren't exactly standard but seem to follow the data presented more closely. For MVT-pedestrian and pedal cyclist a more standard agegroup might be okay (0-14, 15-24, 25-44, 45-64, 65+). If we want/need to keep everything the same throughout SER, this group might be best? Maybe we can decide on Friday's call.
-Beth