eCR/RCKMS Community of Practice

The purpose of the eCR/RCKMS Community of Practice Basecamp is to provide staff from state, local, territorial, and tribal public health agencies with a venue to participate in peer-to-peer discussions pertaining to using RCKMS. This Basecamp is not intended for formal communications about RCKMS or eCR and will not be moderated by CSTE staff. For technical issues or assistance with RCKMS, please visit www.rckms.org to submit a ticket. Disclaimer: The statements and responses posted on the eCR/RCKMS Community of Practice are solely the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC or CSTE.

Looking for something specific? You can type Ctrl+F (for Windows or Linux) or ⌘-F (on Macs) to find something on this page using your browser’s built-in search.

Save the Date: Our next RCKMS CoP Town Hall will be on Wed. July 27 @ 2PM ET. Do you have any topics/questions you would like addressed on this Townhall call?

Sara Mader
Hello,
One question/topic that has come up for WI is regarding the diagnosis and active problem specifications.  In RCKMS, for example, it will say diagnosis of Vaccinia disease (in this example within the orthopoxvirus spec).  And then in the report it lists all the snomeds and ICD 10 codes that make up that diagnosis category.  And for some it can be very broad including many conditions that may or may not line up (according to my epi's).  Is there any future possibility (or maybe possible now and I just don't know how) to allow states to remove some of the specific codes?  What have other states done?  Are other states turning off almost all diagnoses?  Are states looking at these codes specifically when they make decisions?

Also does it say anywhere in the RR or eCR what LOINC/SNOMED/ICD10 code it triggered off of?  I can see the rule determination in the RR but do I have access to more specifics than that? (Or maybe I don't know where to look)
Thanks!
Sara